Saturday, January 13, 2007

OK who's lost in space, or cooper pairs

http://www.nepanewsletter.com/polar.html go ahead laugh,you won't be laughing long... if you make it past the concept, look at the info available here it is useful. So their timing is a little off they haven't missed by much the error appears to be much less then 1% and this is from the stones that cry out to you. The Sumerian's description of our solar system was taken from the opposite perspective ie. The farthest planet away on the outside of our system is numbered 1 and earth is the 7th, they had names that were descriptive, do you know how Neptune got its name? It is an ice ball not a blue marble, think about it, you should end up with a few questions after you ponder the facts. Don't forget nothing is an accident , why do you think they 86ed Pluto from the list? Relax somebody whispered in Z Sitchins ear possibly through the college of the mind or somebody of Edward Tellers quality with a very advanced degree in the mystery religion. Now think about what I just told you they numbered their system from the outside in why? The hardest planet to observe would be the farthest away, wouldn't you discover that planet last, like we did? Are you starting to get it yet ? http://www.sitchin.com/ http://www.thenews.com.pk/update_detail.asp?id=15564

The rest of this might be interesting but hard to fallow, it's encase some one is really looking for a hint- believe me I'd like to meet a Google engineer, these guys have to be cutting edge in A.I., if your aware whats going on, its has to be something to behold. How soon do you think it will be before they turn the knowledge they have gleaned, to control us ? Careful its not called the web for shits and giggles.

So your playing with cooper pairs are you? Do you know the mechanical structure in theory ,why do two oppositely spinning electrons , form a unit that allows unrestricted movement through the lattice or matrix if you prefer? Remember Mr E didn't really have anything until some one verified that mass bent space, the star that appeared behind the sun because light was bent by a force (or is space a medium like water), mass distortion of space, thats a gravity field kids. Remember it's all covered by one concept light or electro magnetic fields are gravity, maybe not exactly the same , thats why we describe light as both a partial and wave the separation is in the relationship of gravity to time. ie light the wave lengths that can't be sensed by our limited bio receivers, think about how they explain the back ground radiation that is constantly present , latent heat from the big bang ? Its non directional.
Realize that HARRP is a phased array http://www.physicsforums.com/archive/index.php/t-15422.html that is beating against the upper atmosphere this is causing a vibration something like beating a drum, now imagine if you where beating on the inside of a drum what is happening out side? Now do you think this vibration might be to produce a refractive interface, think about what you know about light and heat, space is cold but even your limited bio sensors can feel the heat after traveling through space, I wonder how efficient that energy transfer is, how much energy is lost in space and what might be the friction or better yet why is there limited friction, they have determined that there are space waves or turbulence. http://space.com/scienceastronomy/070102_turbulence.html

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2007/01/02/AR2007010200578.html


http://www.dailyindia.com/show/101418.php/Super-massive-black-holes-commonly-converge-during-triple-galaxy-interactions

http://www.innovations-report.de/html/berichte/physik_astronomie/bericht-76693.html

http://space.com/scienceastronomy/070109_toppled_pillars.html

http://www.hamiltonspectator.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=hamilton/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1168296611143&call_pageid=1020420665036&col=1112101662670


http://www.co2science.org/scripts/CO2ScienceB2C/articles/V10/N2/C1.jsp
http://www.ccnmag.com/news.php?id=4705


http://www.stltoday.com/stltoday/news/stories.nsf/sciencemedicine/story/7CF90623429C7F278625725D00112342?OpenDocument

http://www.canada.com/victoriatimescolonist/news/story.html?id=ccf4009e-b828-4f27-8ac8-faa83b7eba29&k=15706

http://www.earthsky.org/radioshows/49601/astrophysicist-seeks-missing-pages-of-universe

http://sciencecareers.sciencemag.org/career_development/previous_issues/articles/2007_01_05/caredit_a0700003/(parent)/68

and lets not forget the TITOR fans
http://www.defensetech.org/archives/003107.html

Titor claimed that we could already measure the difference in gravity and time distortion from sky scrapers remember? Ok last link if you made it this far think about this, because the answer your looking for is in here. http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/Hbase/solids/coop.html

OR MAYBE HERE http://altreligion.about.com/library/texts/bl_kybalion2.htm

No comments: